Tuesday, March 14, 2006

Laudable Pursuit: A 21st Century Response to Dwight Smith

The following is a short excerpt from the Masonic paper titled "Laudable Pursuit: A 21st Century Response to Dwight Smith." Please download and read the full paper from the Knights of the North.



Part One: What Come You Here to Do?

Over the last decade, Grand Lodges all over North America have tried to turn the tide of shrinking membership with one-day classes, reduced proficiency requirements, open solicitation, "cut-rate deals" on multiple degrees, radio, television and billboard advertising blitzes, and many other schemes. The doors to the Temple have been flung wide open, yet the numbers have continued to decline.

The state of the Masonic corpus is lethargic, verging on catatonia, for a lot of reasons, not the least of which is a sloth borne of six decades of euchre nights, pancake breakfasts, fish frys and bean suppers. Gone are the traveling Masonic orators and globe-trotting lecturers who used to pack our lodges and auditoriums because we can see or hear more exciting stuff on 275 digital channels these days. Gone are the days when Scottish Rite auditoriums were jammed with a thousand petitioners for the Spring Convocation when the Rite offered theatrical productions with spectacle and the finest in state-of-the-art special effects.

Younger men who have studied about the Craft before joining it are not finding the lodges of Washington and Franklin and Revere, of Goethe and Mozart and the Royal Society members. True, it is folly to pine for some long-ago "golden age" of Freemasonry, because every age had its own challenges and shortcomings. And there is plenty of room for argument as to which little snapshot of Masonic history to which each of us would like to return.

One thing remains certain: Freemasonry is shrinking. The huge numbers of the 40s, 50s and 60s are gone forever, a statistical aberration that will never happen again. Moreover, the majority of men who have spent decades sending in money to carry cards in their wallets for the York Rite, the Scottish Rite, the Shrine, the Grotto and the OES aren’t going to those places any more than they are attending their Craft Lodges. Masonry will not be saved by the appendant bodies or their charities. The tail cannot wag the dog — Freemasonry must save itself. It is now our job as the next generation of leaders to decide where Freemasonry is headed and how to get it there. Because the Baby Boomers rejected Masonry and most things of their fathers, we are jumping a generation and maybe two — and that provides an opportunity.

We are poised on a ledge, and can either fall into oblivion, or turn around and head a direction different from the one we are going. Not to become just another service club, like Lions or Kiwanis. Not to become more like the "animal" fraternities by turning our lodges into bars and billiard halls. Not to become crass, noisy, self-aggrandizing back-patters for our charities.

We have a brief window of opportunity to return this fraternity to what it once was: the best, the most respected, the most universal and most legendary fraternity in the world. This new generation of members wants to associate with something ancient, something mythical, something legendary; with a group that has been the fraternity of the greatest of men for three centuries; with a fraternity that is worldwide in its scope, and universal in its welcoming of all faiths and all races; with a local lodge that helps the family next door and the school down the street; with a group that once was at the forefront of issues that shaped this country and — arguably — was the crucible that gave birth to the American Revolution because they were men of action and social conscience; with a fraternity that claims as its members the most imaginative minds and the most successful of men.

That's what they read about on the Internet and in books and see in movies and even comics. That's the image they see and what they are looking for when they knock on our doors.

But what do we give them when they enter? Stop for a minute and think about the image your lodge projects. Think about what they expect versus what they find. Given that disparity, how long do we suspect they will stay?

This document is an attempt to turn the tiller of the Craft in another direction — or, rather, to put it back on course. It is a call to stop worshiping at the altar of Change for the sake of Change, and to take a studied approach to improving the overall health of Freemasonry.

Download the entire essay

United Grand Lodge of America publishes standards for amity with other Grand Lodges

The Constitutional Committee of the United Grand Lodge of America of Accepted Free-Masons today published the standards and conditions — the provisos — which a Grand Lodge must meet if they wish to establish amity with the United Grand Lodge of America.

Amity is defined as "peaceful relations; a state of friendship and cordiality."
Each lodge operating under the jurisdiction of the United Grand Lodge of America determines the Masonic status of visiting brethren from other jurisdictions based on personal and Masonic merit. If their Grand Lodge is in amity with the United Grand Lodge of America this process is greatly simplified for the visiting brethren.

Grand Lodges that wish to establish an amicable relationship with the United Grand Lodge of America must meet the following standards:
  • Be in compliance with the Ancient Charges as specified in Bro. James Anderson’s Constitutions of 1723

  • Have a democratic form of Masonic government where all Grand Officers are elected to office either by all of the brethren or the elected representatives of the brethren

  • Have a form of Masonic government where any Master Mason can run for any office in the Grand Lodge

  • Allows any voting member of the Grand Lodge to submit new legislation on the floor of any meeting of the Grand Lodge

  • Allows any Mason under its jurisdiction access to its financial records and those of its charities

  • Conducts independent annual audits of its finances through companies that are in no way connected with Freemasonry

  • Publishes its financial records at each meeting of the Grand Lodge

  • Provides copies of its Masonic Code and/or Constitutions to every Mason under its jurisdiction

  • Provides due process in all matters of Masonic jurisprudence

  • Provides a means for the accused to compel witnesses to testify in his trial

  • Does not convene or have the power to convene special courts for the purpose of trying Masons

  • The Junior Wardens of its individual lodges are the presiding judicial authority in all Masonic trials

  • By Masonic law all trials under its jurisdiction are held in the lodge of the accused

|
| |

Wikipedia-Illuminati Conspiracy!

It took retired journalist John Seigenthaler, Sr., a lot of time and grief to get the giant Wikipedia website to remove entries that linked him to the assasinations of both John F. Kennedy and his brother Robert F. Kennedy. A prankster, who claims to not have known that some people take Wikipedia seriously, finally admitted to posting the bogus entries.

Apparently Seigenthaler didn't have the power and mysterious connections that United Nations Secretary General Kofi Annan has, at least according to a new conspiracy theory being spun by Canada Free Press founding editor Judi McLeod, an award-winning journalist with 30 years experience in the media. A former Toronto Sun and Kingston Whig Standard columnist, she has also appeared on Newsmax.com, the Drudge Report, Foxnews.com, and World Net Daily. Gotta figure she swings to the right side of the Wing with a list of publications like that.

McLeod's article at the Canada Free Press states that the bio of Kofi Annan at Wikipedia has been altered, that the mention of Annan's father being a "high ranking freemason" has been removed surreptitiously from the encyclopedia. She bases this rather amusing conclusion on the fact that a November 2002 bio of Annan published on William Shaw Cross's Saga magazine begins: "Kofi Annan, United Nations Secretary General was born in Ghana in 1938. His mother was from the Fante tribe on the Cape Coast of Ghana and his father was half Fante, half Ashanti. Annan could have become a chief of either tribe. In the last days of the British Empire, his father was in business, a manager in Lever Brothers subsidiary and a leading Freemason."

Wikipedia doesn't mention it. Neither does it mention the Saga article at all.

The "conspiracy" thickens. In the Talk Section at Wikipedia, an editor says, "the thing is, I'm having trouble finding evidence that the mentioned information was ever in this article.... I have looked through all 542 revisions to this article, from the first on 03:06, 23 September 2001 to the last at 01:43, 8 February 2006. None of those revisions have any mention of the word 'freemason.'"

Still, McLeod insists the reference to freemasonry has been removed. She fans the flames of conspiracy with these words:
Even though it has more than 6 million members worldwide, Freemasonry and what it stands for is something not readily understood by the chattering classes. One needs the time and patience to go back through history to ever begin to understand the intrigues of this all-boy organization.

According to Freemasons, Illuminati and Associates, "Freemasonry is the largest international secret society in the world.

"The highest degree of the Scottish rite of Freemasonry, the Meritorious Degree, the Degree of the Illuminati, whose motto is "Ordo Ab Chao," or "Out of Chaos comes order" — which literally means if they break down the existing structure and cause the population to cry out for order, they will emerge as rulers and have the world that they seek."

How many politicians create havoc only to jump in and save us right around election time?

Interesting to note that many of the estimated six million Free Masons occupy leadership positions around the world.

Almost as interesting to note that some conspiracy types swear that the main agenda of the United Nations is for One World Order.

Was Kofi Annan’s father a "leading Freemason"?

If the father of the seventh and current Secretary General of the United Nations was a Freemason, what affect [sic] did this have on the little boy who grew up to run the world’s largest bureaucracy?

Meanwhile, why did the information about Kofi Annan’s father being a high-ranking Freemason flat out disappear from Wikipedia?

For sure, the answer would make for an intriguing story.

| |
| |

Monday, March 13, 2006

1999 speech at the Grand Lodge of Alabama on Prince Hall recognition


According to the blog Free-Mason-Alert: The Sad Truth about Freemasonry in Alabama, in 1999 Brother Alex Harris addressed the Grand Lodge of Alabama with these noble words:
Most Worshipful Grand Master, Right Worshipful Grand Wardens, Brethren,

I have spent a lot of time thinking about what to say to you today. There are so many issues that could be addressed regarding recognition of Prince Hall Masonry. Eventually though, the argument always comes back to race. So I decided to acknowledge that fact and to stop trying so hard to avoid it. Some may be offended by the observations I am about to make. Some because they have watched quietly as their beloved Masonry has been used as a front for something they would never be a part of. Others because they will realize I am describing them and they have spent their lives convincing themselves they do not hold those views. And still others, who do not hide the fact they are racist, will be very upset because these statements will threaten the existence of our lodges as "whites only."

Many Masons have told me they could not support this resolution because their lodge will not support it. Others believe in recognition but are honest enough to admit they do not have the courage to stand up in lodge and say so. And still others believe in recognition but they will not support it because they feel Alabama is not ready for it.

Since when are we concerned about whether the population is "ready" to give up something that is blatantly wrong? Is not part of being a Mason having the courage to stand up for what is just and right, regardless of the consequences? Didn't we learn that from the Masonic founding fathers of our country? Of course, Alabama has been desegregated for over thirty years. We're ready. Brethren, this is 1999. The country has been integrated for a generation. The world has been integrated a lot longer than that.

Masons in the rest of the world, and the United States for that matter, can't fathom our refusal to accept Prince Hall Masons. The issue is gaining momentum. So far recognition has been granted, or is being negotiated, in thirty US Jurisdictions, seven Canadian jurisdictions and nine other foreign jurisdictions. The United Grand Lodge of England has recognized Prince Hall Masonry in eighteen jurisdictions. This means that every possible argument against recognition has already been debated and refuted in other jurisdictions and there is not a legitimate Masonic reason to deny recognition to Prince Hall Masonry.

My fear is that one day other jurisdictions will withdraw recognition from Alabama because they believe us to be clandestine since we refuse to recognize the brotherhood of all men. If you think it can't happen, talk to Masons in other jurisdictions. They are discussing it. Will their Grand Lodges take action? I do not know. If they do not address our lack of action then someone, somewhere, will do the same thing we have done here today. They will feel their Grand Lodge is ignoring a vital issue and propose a resolution themselves.

Too many Masons don't want to sit in lodge with blacks. Fine points of Masonry have been perverted to defend racism that would not be tolerated in the rest of society. You do not want to know the statements I have heard since this resolution was proposed. I am going to tell you some of them anyway because they should be heard.

You need to know what Masonry is harboring today. A Past Master told me there are lodges I should not visit because I might not make it out of there. Another Past Master stated that "My grand-children may have to go to school with them but I sure won't sit in lodge with them." He also stated that, if this resolution passes, he and all his sons would be forced to leave Masonry and that we would lose at least half our members. I have been asked "what is going on at your lodge with all this 'nigger' talk." I have been asked if I wanted to sit in lodges with "blue-gums." I have never heard that racial slur before, so I guess this has been an educational process too.
I want to respond to a few of the statements you just heard. First and foremost... if, because I favor recognition, I would be in physical danger... then Masonry does not exist here anymore. Second... anyone who would leave Masonry, because Prince Hall Masonry is granted recognition, is a Mason in title only. Its lessons are obviously not in their hearts. We may lose a large number of members if the resolution passes. So mote it be. Let them trade their aprons for white sheets with hoods. We are better off without them.

There are those who are livid with me right now. They are thinking, "How dare he say that!" or "Saying things like that is a Masonic offense!" or "He should remember his obligation!" My response is this... If speaking the truth, no matter how unpopular, is a Masonic offense, I am guilty and you should expel me because I am going to continue speaking these truths until we do the right thing.

My dear brethren... We are men, but more than that we are Masons, but more than that we are the creation of the Great Architect Of The Universe. Let us not sully his creation by letting it be associated with evil actions or beliefs. Have the courage to STAND UP and say you will do what is right. STAND UP and say you will no longer allow the order to be used to perpetuate racism. STAND UP and announce that we believe in the brotherhood of ALL men. But most importantly, remember the trowel you were presented with at your raising... remember what it teaches us... and then stand up and vote that Prince Hall Masonry is now, and always has been, a legitimate branch of Masonry that the Grand Lodge of Alabama should grant full fraternal recognition to.

Thank you.

A second post at the Free-Mason-Alert blog asks readers to "Ask the Grand Lodge."
  1. Ask them if they will Recognize African Americans as Freemasons.

  2. Ask them if they will Remove the 1876 Resolution & Declare it wrong.

  3. Ask them if they support the Toleration Statement.
Toleration Statement

The brotherhood of all mankind is a beautiful idea, but is it really possible? What could bring about such a utopian concept? Throughout the centuries the greatest philosophical minds have struggled with this difficult question. Whole systems of government and religion have been developed with this single aim in mind, but yet none have succeeded. Is mankind doomed to be forever separated by the uniqueness of each individual?

A quick and easy solution for making people unite is to create a common enemy. At first this approach works very well and will unite people for the purpose of security and survival. This method, however, is flawed because it is rooted in the creation of fear, and it requires that some other group of men, by necessity, be the source of that fear. Eventually fear begins to feed upon itself and the society is destroyed from within.

Another method of uniting people is through conformity to a religious or social system. This system works well for those who agree with the system because they willingly conform to the religious dogmas or social values. Those who disagree with the system are labeled heretics or radicals. As time passes this method results in the persecution of those people unwilling to conform with the system, and almost always ends in violence and death.

Speculative Free-Masonry is a product of the Age of Enlightenment. Its founders were the predecessors of men such as the American founding fathers. They realized an eternal truth about the nature of being human - we are all unique individuals with different perspectives about life and the cosmos. This simple truth led them to create a beautiful system for uniting people with diverse ideas, religions, and customs through the principle of Universal Tolerance. Thus, Speculative Free-Masonry is neither a union for security, nor a union of conformity, but a Union of Diversity.
Universal Tolerance is the very Cornerstone of the Masonic Temple, without it Free-Masonry is no different than the scores of other organizations that demand conformity with some dogma or social order. Unfortunately, many Free-Masons have removed this Cornerstone from their Temples, and the results have been catastrophic. Since 1963 American Free-Masonry has declined in membership by 50%, and new members quickly leave due to the prevailing conformist attitude of these brothers and their Lodges.

Current Grand Lodge officers and their email addresses:

Most Worshipful Grand Master Frank W. Little
fwlittle@bellsouth.net

Right Worshipful Deputy Grand Master Jamie A. Smith
bettys98@charter.net

Right Worshipful Senior Grand Warden Larry Stinson
lstinson@alaweb.com"

Right Worshipful Junior Grand Warden Teddy Grogan
tedgro6@earthlink.net"

Noble goals enumerated in the Mission Statement of the Grand Lodge of Alabama include "promot[ing] Friendship, Morality and Brotherly Love throughout the state..." and "to promote Honor, Integrity and Truth to all men."

Twenty-six percent of Alabama's population is black, over twice the U.S. average. It seems the Grand Lodge of Alabama could find plenty of new men to "promote honor, integrity and truth to" if they'd just recognize black Masons.

| |
| | |

Has Noah's Ark been found?


A mountainside "anomaly" in Turkey has at least one man excited at the possibility that Noah's Ark has been located.

On the northwest corner of Mount Ararat in eastern Turkey an unknown structure lies nearly submerged in glacial ice. Noah's ark was described in the Bible as measureing 300 by 60 cubits, a 6:1 ratio. The unknown structure on the mountain is close to this proportion.

Porcher Taylor, a retired national security analyst and currently an associate professor in paralegal studies at the University of Richmond (Virginia), has made it his persona quest to have the intelligence community declassify satellite imagery of the Turkish mountain to determine if the anamoly is actually an ancient ship.

"I'm calling this my satellite archeology project," Taylor said. Taylor has used in his search images from QuickBird, GeoEye's Ikonos spacecraft, Canada's Radarsat 1, as well as declassified aerial and satellite images taken by the various U.S. intelligence agencies.

"I had no preconceived notions or agendas when I began this in 1993 as to what I was looking for," Taylor said.

While admitting that the story of Noah's Ark may be legend instead of truth, he believes the anomaly is an artificial ridge line and not something made of snow, ice and rock "I maintain that if it is the remains of something manmade and potentially nautical, then it's potentially something of biblical proportions," Taylor said.

New satellites have excited Taylor. "We've got three new birds that are going up. I'm using all my clout, rapport and lobbying to, hopefully, have them at least fly calibration runs over Mt. Ararat," Taylor said.

The accompanying image is DigitalGlobe's QuickBird commercial remote sensing satellite image of the Mt. Ararat "anomaly" in 2003.

| |
| | |

Fighting City Hall: Part 2


by W:.Tim Bryce, PM, MPS, timb001@phmainstreet.com, Palm Harbor, Florida, USA
"A Foot Soldier for Freemasonry"

"Pessimist: The optimist who didn't arrive." — Bro. Samuel Clemens (Mark Twain), Polar Star Lodge No. 79 A.F.& A.M., St. Louis, MO

In my last article entitled Fighting City Hall, I'd one Brother drop me a note that I was too pessimistic; that I was describing the rift between the old-guard and the young-guard with broad strokes. He contended the problems I was describing was geographical in nature and unique to "Dixie" (the southern United States). While I admit I talked in generalities with a couple of specific examples, I received numerous e-mails from Brothers around the world who supported my argument. No, I do not believe the problem is unique to Dixie but, rather, a universal problem facing all jurisdictions.

The following is a sampling of the e-mails I received. The identities of the authors have been omitted to protect their anonymity.

FROM MANITOBA — I enjoyed your "Fighting City Hall" article. A similar situation occurred in Manitoba recently when the Grand Lodge library was being renovated. The Grand Librarian was relieved after trying to bring our antiquated library up to date. The changes he was trying to implement were considered too radical.

I have contacts in England and they tell me the same thing is going on there - Lodges are forming underground regardless of permission from Grand Lodge! Imagine that!

FROM WASHINGTON STATE — While our Grand Lodge is very much a forward thinking organization, some of our Blue Lodges, Scottish and York Rite, and Shrines all suffer from one or more of the maladies brought forward in your article.

FROM CONNECTICUT — There is an old saying that you catch more flies with sugar than with vinegar. Sounds like some Masons are up against a well entrenched group of men who like the climate at the top of the mountain and most likely will pick their successors. But there are forward looking men in the crowd as well.

I'm now speaking from personal experience, and giving wise council. Be a diplomat, lead them in the direction you want them to go, and let them take the credit, feed their ego if that is what it takes. Rivalry only hurts our craft. Abe Lincoln may have said it first, "A house divided can not stand." A Johnny Reb by the name of Allen Roberts also used those words.

FROM NEW BRUNSWICK — We are going through a similar situation here in New Brunswick. A real power struggle between the Grand Master and wannebe power brokers who brag they can elect or deny an office to anybody they choose. There is a movement underfoot to keep the Deputy Grand Master from reaching the Grand East and they're trying every dirty trick in the book.

City Hall can be taken on. City Hall can be forced to obey the rules the same as everyone else. It just needs someone to have the intestinal fortitude to take them on.

FROM DIXIE (THE SOUTH) — I have been reading your recent articles with much interest. Our fraternity has contributed so much to freedom and change within our society. It is distressing that it now seems to have adopted some of the methods it has resisted throughout history. Sad to say but the future does not look bright.

FROM NEW MEXICO — One of the things I discovered as a Past Master of my lodge in Albuquerque was that you can have fun in lodge and keep all the tenants of Masonry intact. Once you start having fun, the grouches either leave or start enjoying lodge. I shut one old grouch up when my Chaplin called and said he had been driving over eight hours direct from Denver Colorado (440 miles) and still had to drive home to change clothes to attend lodge and, therefore, would be a little late. This would have resulted in him driving another 70 miles. 35 miles past the lodge and then 35 miles back, then an additional 35 miles home after lodge. He said he was in shorts and flip flops. I told him to just stop by the lodge, no matter how he was dressed. He attended and wore the Chaplain's robe. The old grouch complained to me how the Chaplain was dressed and I told the grouch that I would rather have the man and his heart in lodge, than to have his cold fancy suit in lodge. Sometimes you need to bend to the wind like a tree as opposed to breaking a limb off by being too rigid.

FROM DIXIE (THE SOUTH) — I don't know if I fit in with the old guard and know I don't fit in with the new ones. I'm 49 years old and been a Mason for 27 years.

I've not attended lodge in my hometown in years. When I first transferred down here, I attended every meeting. Still, I was treated like an outsider and had no fellowship at all. Same ole, same ole. Eat a snack (alone), open lodge, read the minutes, bills, take up a collection, close lodge and go home.

No one has ever called me or had any contact with me. Frankly, they couldn't care less if I attended the meetings or not. I'm not one of the homegrown nor influential men at the lodge.

My wife asked my why I keep paying my dues every year but don't go to lodge. She was really disappointed when not one single Lodge nor a Brother Mason even give us any info to relocate to their area. Much less an offer to help.

We are still planning on relocating to the mountains this spring. I will go to the nearest lodge wherever we move and just hope that I fit in and people will receive me with a warm welcome and not a cold shoulder like they have here.

FROM OHIO — I just finished reading your article, "Fighting City Hall." First, you had a good analogy between the mainframe and PC mentality. Where I work, that battle rages on. Anyway, getting to the subject at hand, it is a very nasty battle but one that must be ended. Ours is an organization based very deeply in tradition. That is what makes it so appealing in many respects. However, we can keep our identity while adjusting to the changing times. I joined DeMolay in 1972. I joined Masonry in 1978. I was a junior officer for two years before I left the line and discontinued attending due to the pompous attitudes and demanding manner of our predecessors. I would not leave the fraternity due to my belief and commitment to it. This was not always the case with some members. I simply waited until a time when I felt the attitudes were better. I served as Worshipful Master in the 1990's. Being in my 30's, I still did not get the respect of some of the older Past Masters that the office should dictate. I have subsequently served as a District Education Officer and District Deputy Grand Master. The Past Masters who were troublesome to me and other youthful Masters have moved on. Some have moved out of the state. Some have demitted to more accommodating Lodges for their "needs." Others just quit coming. Those of us who remain use these members as an example of how not to treat the younger members. Unkind as it seems, we must use them as a benchmark to understand what will work and, more importantly, what is detrimental. We now have a very good flow of young members and a young line. We are trying to set the example that everyone is vital and no thought or idea is unwelcome.

FROM DIXIE (THE SOUTH) — I am a new secretary at my Lodge, where we have had our share of "that's the way we have always done it" and where various agendas have been carried out in the ten years since I became a Mason. We will see a bit of this in the next few months as we debate legislation to come up at Grand Lodge, and various factions battle it out. You are right about the statements against individuals – we saw that in the Grand Master's election two or three years ago.

All Lodges face problems of retention, especially of young members and while we have 430 or so members, we have the same problem at our Lodge. Our expenses continue to rise.

I look forward to more of your writing. It is good, and it is needed.

FROM CONNECTICUT — I fully agree with the statements about the "old guard." I was raised a Master Mason in my Lodge in the early 1990's and became Tyler shortly thereafter. I remained at that post for nine years. While I was a member of this Lodge, I saw several ways that we could have made ourselves more visible and ways of gaining new members. However, the "old guard" didn't want to make any changes. After awhile I gave up and obtained a dual membership with another Lodge. After a year, I dropped my membership with my mother Lodge. My current Lodge is very active in town and continues to grow. I'm proud to be a member, knowing they are open to new ideas and in working closely with the community.

FROM DIXIE (THE SOUTH) — I remember a situation a couple of years ago where our Lodge was notified of a Brother from New York who was dying of brain cancer. His daughter contacted the Lodge and told the Master that he wished he could sit in Lodge one last time before passing. Our Worshipful Master contacted the Brother's home Lodge and received an e-mail from the Secretary who extended fraternal greetings to the Brother and a brief report on the Lodge's activities. The Master then took two other Lodge Brothers to visit the dying Brother at his home (he was bedridden). To his credit, the Master went to the Brother, closed the bedroom door for privacy, and opened Lodge. Although the Brother was very sick, he perked up noticeably. The Master read the note from his home Lodge, talked with the Brother and asked if he had a message for his home Lodge (which the Master dutifully conveyed). The attending Brothers then closed the Lodge, thanked the daughter (who was outside), and left. Two weeks later the Brother passed away. Shortly thereafter, the Master received a note from the daughter thanking him for visiting her father and commented that although she didn't know what the group had done, her father's disposition had picked up as a result of the visit. She was grateful for the group's efforts.

When the Worshipful Master reported the visit in Lodge, many of the old guard were appalled that the Master had opened a Lodge without dispensation from the Grand Lodge, that it was most irregular. I don't know, I saw it as a very kind and Masonic act. I just wish I had gone with the Master.

FROM NEW JERSEY — I've been away from our Lodge for several years. I never felt welcome. I came in as my friend was Worshipful Master. I was full of ideas to bring some life into the Lodge. Well, there was a lot of political nonsense. It wrecked the agenda of my friend as Master. I stopped attending Lodge. While a realist, I felt that too many Brothers were not acting like the Masonic ideal.

FROM DIXIE (THE SOUTH) — I've been a Master Mason for over 27 years and almost resigned because of being ignored and made to feel unwelcome.

The one time that I've asked the lodge for any help was when I wrote to dozens of different lodges from Georgia to Pennsylvania and everywhere in-between, only asking general questions about their area because we were thinking of relocating. A few lodges responded but I never heard anything else from them. I also wrote to many individual Brothers, but I did not get a reply.

We need to remember our obligations and in order to get people to attend lodge, lodge must be interesting (not just open lodge, read the minutes, business, then close and go home).

We need to be friendly and helpful to each other and not only to the more wealthy or influential members.

I've not attended lodge in years. Why? Because no one cares if I come or not. When I did attend, I was more or less ignored.

When we first moved here, I attended lodge every time it was open. At the fellowship hour before lodge we would have a light meal (and pass around the hat). I wasn't homegrown nor did I have an important job, so most of the time, I ate alone. The men would shake my hand when I came but had little to say to me after that.

During lodge, the policemen would all sit together, longtime friends would sit together, family sat together and again, most of the time, I sat alone.

When I tried to engage in conversation, I was given short answers. It was clear that I didn't fit in.

Never has anyone at the lodge asked where I lived, what I do for a hobby, asked me to go fishing with them, included me in on local political talk, invited me to their house. If a member saw me in public, I was lucky to get them to nod their head, acknowledging me.

Talk about Southern hospitality... The only lodges that responded to my cry for help were a few lodges in Pennsylvania.

FROM THE PHILIPPINES — Your article about "Fighting City Hall" is not only happening in the United States, but I think in other jurisdictions as well. Like here in the Philippines where the older and younger guards are not on good terms due to ideas and actions that are not amenable to both sides. An example of this is in one Lodge, young guards wanted the stated meeting moved from morning to afternoon because they wanted to have their fellowship right after the meeting, but the oldies do not want it to be moved. So what happened? The oldies cannot convene the meeting because they are not in quorum which is seven or more... in short, the younger ones are the majority and this is one of the classic example that our fraternity is dwindling. It's right that what you have said about that change is constant!

EPILOGUE

In my article "True Masonry," I differentiated how Brothers interpret Freemasonry; some see it as a noble society based on Brotherly love and affection, and there are others who see it as nothing more than a club governed by rules and regulations. True, rules and regulations are needed in any organization to maintain order but there are those who would sacrifice the spirit by which this great fraternity was created to serve a particular political agenda. Make no mistake, the rift between young and old in Freemasonry is about control and who possesses the correct interpretation of Freemasonry.

Some say I am being too pessimistic about the fraternity. Frankly, I think I am a realist who is smart enough to know you cannot treat a patient unless he knows he is sick. No, I am most definitely not a pessimist. To paraphrase Bro. Clemens, "I am an optimist who hasn't arrived."

Keep the Faith.

NOTE: As with all of my articles herein, please feel free to reuse them in Masonic publications or re-post them on Masonic web sites (except Florida). When doing so, please add the following:

Article reprinted with permission of the author and "Freemason Information."

Friday, March 10, 2006

Big Love buzzes Beehive State


Not two days after we wrote about it, the new HBO program Big Love, whose central characters are involved in a group marriage, has ignited controversy. The show has not yet aired. Donald Wildmon and James Dobson, the world's biggest prudes, haven't chimed in yet, but the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, the Mormons, are all a-flutter worrying about the image the show will present of the Church and of the "institution" of polygamy.

The Beehive State of Utah gets its nickname from the symbolic use of the beehive in Mormon doctrine. The beehive symbol was appropriated from Freemasonry by Mormon church founder Joseph Smith.

| |
| |

Thursday, March 09, 2006

Freemasonry and the Knight of the Rose Cross of Gold

What is the Rose Cross of Gold?

The Rose Cross of Gold represents a form of modern Knighthood that is derived from the time honored principles and ideals of Freemasonry. It is a Masonic body specifically dedicated to the gentleman and the scholar who enjoys the company and camaraderie of other like-minded men and Masons. The Rose Cross of Gold is on the collegiate level; the depth of Masonic knowledge is uncompromisingly the most complete, accurate, and awe-inspiring collection of materials preserved throughout the ages.

The Rose Cross of Gold provides a thought provoking and fun experience to its members, and offers a form of fraternity and enlightenment not to be found elsewhere.

What is "Traditional Freemasonry"?

Traditional implies that something is being carried on from the past. In this case the RCG continues to practice the degrees of Freemasonry as they were intended. The RCG takes pride in initiating one Candidate at a time in the time honored traditions of the Craft, and instructing him in the value and meaning of each degree. The RCG does not offer any "one day classes" that rush a Candidate through all of the degrees, because he will take away little if anything of value from such a process. The RCG is sincerely dedicated to giving each Mason the individual attention that he deserves as a brother of our great fraternity.

The Rose Cross of Gold is a traditional observance Masonic body. RCG Lodges have dress codes for both the degrees and festive boards. The Lodge opens only for degree work, instruction, and business. Business is generally conducted once per quarter, thereby avoiding the boring repetition of events that is so common throughout most of modern Masonry today. Festive Boards are held regularly and include presentations and discussions about the history, philosophy and symbolism of Freemasonry.

21st-century Masons are faced with the daunting task of interpreting 300 year old language and culture into a coherent and meaningful philosophy in the Post Modern age. Most fail to recognize the differences in language and culture that separate them from the degrees they have received. They assume that terms such as "Morality," "Science," "Disinterestedness," and "Art" had the same meanings in the past as they do today.

The Rose Cross of Gold seeks to "bridge" these issues by bringing the language and culture of early Freemasonry to its post modern members through education and discussion. The Rose Cross of Gold has assembled a series of educational materials that are specifically designed to bring the history, language, and culture of 18th century Europe into focus, thereby, allowing the newest members of the Craft access to the world of Freemasonry and the Enlightenment.

What about Masonic Education?


The Rose Cross of Gold places an emphasis on Masonic education, and has developed a system of readings and lectures that ensures each Mason's knowledge of the material he is presented. Rapidly passing from one degree to the next is discouraged, as there is no benefit to working through the material rapidly. Each brother is encouraged to take their time and learn as much as possible from the experience and materials.

What makes the Rose Cross of Gold "Progressive"?


As an example, your grandfather's Freemasonry offered some education in the ancient Greek and Roman Quadrivium:
  • Arithmetic
  • Geometry
  • Music
  • Astronomy
The Rose Cross of Gold offers you the opportunity to learn about:
  • Mathematics
  • Hyperbolic Geometry
  • Harmonics
  • Astrophysics
Freemasonry is centered around learning about the Cosmos and our place within it. While in 1717 basic Euclidian Geometry and Astronomy may have been the cutting edge of scientific advancements, it is taught to teenagers today. Our brotherhood focuses on furthering your understanding of our world, and not just repeating what you've already learned.

What is "Red" Freemasonry?

"Red" Freemasonry is practiced primarily on the Continent, more specifically in France, and has its formal roots at the end of the 17th century. Some scholars believe that the founders of the Grand Lodge in London, during the reformation of 1717, actually practiced "Red" Freemasonry and only later, during the merger with the Grand Lodge of the "Antients," converted to the York or "Blue" system in use today.

Degrees and Orders of Knighthood offered by the Rose Cross of Gold:
  • 1° Entered Apprentice Mason
  • 2° Fellow-Craft Mason
  • 3° Master Mason
  • Knight of the Rose Cross of Gold
A "deeper and more personal sense of fraternity" in what way?

The old Lodges of the 17th and 18th centuries were very small and personal; every member was intimately acquainted with the others. This created an unprecedented aura of closeness, camaraderie, and brotherly love that is altogether missing from the larger fraternal lodges. During this early period Freemasons literally had to trust one another with their very lives. A traitor in their midst could represent the difference between "peace and harmony," and a roasting over a slow fire. The Rose Cross of Gold continues the tradition of maintaining unique small Lodges that represent the creativity and interests of their members.

Does the Rose Cross of Gold allow alcohol at its functions?

Yes, under the rules established by the United Grand Lodge of America there is not any prohibition against alcohol.

The 13 Principles of Chivalry

1. A True Knight must be a gentleman yet fails not in duty.

2. A True Knight must uphold the Dignity of Man remembering that all are born free and equal in Dignity and Rights.

3. A True Knight’s manner of living is an example to the young.

4. A True Knight shall at no time act outrageously nor do murder or be cruel in any way to man or beast.

5. A True Knight respects and defends the rights of all men to hold and practice religious beliefs other than his own.

6. A True Knight takes no part in wrongful quarrel but at all times supports the Lawful rights of all men.

7. A True Knight’s word is his bond.

8. A True Knight must be honorable in all things knowing, good from evil.

9. A True Knight must be of modest demeanor and not seek worship unto himself.

10. A True Knight must seek out such Quests as lead to the protection of the oppressed and never fail in Charity, Fidelity and the Truth.

11. A True Knight speaks evil of no man. A slanderous tongue brings shame and disgrace to a Honorable Knight.

12. A True Knight never betrays a trust or confidence given to him by a brother Knight.

13. A True Knight must so order his life that by his contributions the people of the world may hope to live together in greater peace and tolerance.

For more information about the Rose Cross of Gold, visit their website, or send them an email.

| |
| | |

The most sacred Altar on earth is the soul of man


The concept of an altar is as old as man's concept of himself and of God.

The earliest altar was a rough, unhewn stone. The Old Testament tells of stone altars being set up by Noah, Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Moses, and other patriarchs. More elaborate altars of wood and brass were built to accompany the Ark of the Covenant.

The shape of an altar eventually came to be more cubical, with carvings and inlays of brass and precious stones. When temples came to be built, altars became more elaborate still. The Jews then built two altars, one for sacrifice, the other for the burning of incense.

Christian churches followed in the footsteps of their Hebrew predecessors, utilizing altars in their worship services.

According to the Catholic Encyclopedia, early churches were oblong, situated on an east-to-west plane, and the altar was placed in the east, the source of light. Freemasonry places the altar in the center of a lodgeroom, but recognizes that the true source of light does indeed come from the east.

In 2nd Chronicles and in 1st Kings, the altar of King Solomon's temple is described as being made wholly of brass, and covering a structure made of stone or earth. It was renewed by Asa, removed by Ahaz, "cleansed" by Hezekiah, and then broken up and carried away by the Babylonians. It was re-erected upon the return of the Jews from Babylonian captivity, defiled by Antiochus IV, and renewed again by Judas Maccabeus when he re-took Jerusalem. There again it stood until the Roman destruction of Jerusalem in 70 A.D.

The underlying stone formation that held the altar is believed to still stand at the site, now the Mosque of Omar underneath the great dome.

A dismantled altar was discovered at the ruins of ancient Beersheba and was most likely destroyed during a revival, possibly by King Hezekiah. The Bible says that Hezekiah, "removed the high places and broke down the sacred pillars and cut down the Asherah. He also broke in pieces the bronze serpent that Moses had made, for until those days the sons of Israel burned incense to it." (2 Kings 18:4). One of the stones that compose this altar is engraved with a serpent.

A stone altar found in Scotland dates from 200 A.D., and is believed to have been used for human sacrifice.

Today altars are used not only in Freemasonry and Christian churches, but in Jewish synagogues (known as the bimah), Buddhist temples and homes, in pagan or earth-based traditional rites, and in modern-day homes.

Early altars were used to hold animal and sometimes human sacrifices to deities. Altars came to hold also incense, fires, relics and other more symbolic devices, such as gemstones, books, or other items that hold special meaning to the users of the altar, such as the Square, Compasses and Volume of Sacred Law on a Freemasonic altar.

Personal altars are used today as a meditation site, a place to focus one's energies, to sit and think and to pray, and thus these altars hold objects that symbolize the user's goals, dreams and desires. Gemstones and colored cloths are often placed upon such altars, as well as candles and incense.

Initiation

Initiation into Freemasonry is a journey designed to lead the candidate into a greater knowledge of the Self and the Self's relationship to God and the Universe. Masonry calls self-knowledge "the most interesting of all human studies."

W. L. Wilmshurt, in his early 20th century essay "Masonic Initiation: The Knowledge of the Self," tells us that the very word "initiation" comes from the Latin "in ire," "to go within." He says:
...and thence, after learning the lessons of self-analysis, to make a new beginning (initium) by reconstructing one's knowledge of life and manner of living. The 43rd Psalm restates the same instruction: Introibo ad altare Dei, "I will go in to the divine altar." Similarly, the Masonic Initiation contemplates a going within oneself, until one reaches the altar or centre, the Divine Principle or ultimate hidden basis of our being.
Thus the altar (and the Three Great Lights upon the Holy Altar) represents true self-knowledge, the:
"...unobstructed conscious union of the human spirit with God and the realization of their identity. In that identic union the unreal, superficial selves have become obliterated. The sense of personality is lost, merged in the Impersonal and Universal. The little Ego is assumed into the great All, and knows as It knows. Man realizes his own inherent ultimate Divinity, and henceforth lives and acts no longer as a separate individual, with an independent will, but in integration with the Divine Life and Will, whose instrument he becomes, whose purposes he thenceforth serves. This is "the great day of atonement," when the limited personal consciousness becomes identified or made at one with one's own divine, omniscient, vital and immortal Principle, which each must realize as the high priest of his personal temple and after many washings and purifyings against the contrary tendencies of his former unregenerate nature. This was the secret supreme attainment hinted at in the cryptic maxim "Know thyself!" Each of us may judge for himself whether he has yet reached it.

To find our own Centre, our real self, involves, therefore, a turning inwards of our previously externalized faculties of sense and thought, and an introspective penetration of the outlying circumferential elements of our nature until the Centre" is found. This task is figured by our ceremonial perambulations and by the path of the winding staircase leading from the ante-rooms and forecourts of our nature to the Centre, up which the aspirant must ascend, asking, seeking, knocking, all the way; being subjected from time to time to tests of his progress and receiving, without scruple or diffidence, such wages of good fortune or adversity as unseen Providences may know to be his due.

...Masonic Initiation has no other end than this conscious union between the individual soul and the Universal Divine Spirit.

This union is symbolized by the familiar conjunction of the square and the compasses. The square is the emblem of the soul; the compasses of the Spirit which indwells in that soul. At first the Mason sees the points of the compasses concealed behind the square, and, as he progresses, their points emerge from that concealment until both become superimposed upon the square.

Thus is indicated the progressive subordination of the soul and the corresponding coming forward of the ultimate Spirit into personal consciousness, so that the Mason can "work with both those points," thus becoming an efficient builder in the spirit
and rendering the circle of his own being complete by attaining conscious alliance with his ultimate and only true self.

An anonymous Masonic Short Talk Bulletin from February 1924 further enlightens us:

A Masonic Lodge is a symbol of the world as it was thought to be in the olden times. Our ancient Brethren had a profound insight when they saw that the world is a Temple, over-hung by a starry canopy at night, lighted by the journeying sun by day, wherein man goes forth to his labor on a checker-board of lights and shadows, joy and sorrows, seeking to reproduce on earth the law and order of heaven. The visible world was but a picture or reflection of the invisible, and at its center stood the Altar of sacrifices, obligation and adoration.

While we hold a view of the world very unlike that held by our Ancient Brethren — knowing it to round, not flat and square — yet their insight is still true. The whole idea was that man, if he is to build either a House of Faith, or an order of society that is to endure, he must initiate the laws and principles of the world in which he lives. That is also our dream and design; the love of it ennobles our lives; it is our labor and worship. To fulfill it we too need wisdom and help from above; and so at the center of the Lodge stands the same Altar — older than all Temples, as old as life itself — a focus of faith and fellowship, at once a symbol and shrine of that unseen element of thought and yearning that all men are aware of and which no one can define.

Upon this earth there is nothing more impressive than the silence of a company of human beings bowed together at an Altar.

No thoughtful man but at some time has mused over the meaning of this great adoring habit of our humanity, and the wonder of it deepens the longer he ponders it. The instinct which thus draws men together to prayer is the strange power which has drawn together the stones of Great Cathedrals, where the mystery of God is embodied. So far as we know, man is the only being on our planet that pauses to pray, and the wonder of his worship tells us more about him than any other fact. By some deep necessity of his nature he is a seeker after God, and in moments of sadness or longing, in hours of tragedy or terror, he lays aside his tools and looks out over the far horizon.

The history of the Altar in the life of man is a story more fascinating than any fiction. Whatever else man may have been — cruel, tyrannous or vindictive — the record of his long search for God is enough to prove that he is not wholly base, not altogether an animal. Rites horrible, and often bloody, may have been part of his early ritual, but if the history of past ages had left us nothing but the memory of a race at prayer, it would have left us rich. And so, following the good custom of the men which were of old, we set up an Altar in the Lodge, lifting up hands in prayer, moved thereto by the ancient need and aspiration of our humanity. Like the men who walked in the grey years agone, our need is for the living God to hallow these our days and years, even to the last ineffable homeward sigh which men call death.

...As far back as we can go the Altar was the center of human society, and an object of peculiar sanctity by virtue of that law of association by which places and things are consecrated. It was a place of refuge for the hunted or the tormented — criminals or slaves — and to drag them away from it by violence was held to be an act of sacrilege, since they were under the protection of God. At the Altar, marriage rites were solemnized, and treaties made or vows taken in its presence were more Holy and binding than if made elsewhere, because, there man invoked God as witness. In all the religions of antiquity, and especially among peoples who worshipped the light, it was the usage of both Priests and people to pass around the Altar following the course of the sun — from the East, by way of the South, to the West — singing hymns of praise as a part of their worship. Their ritual was thus an allegorical picture of the truth which underlies all religion — that man must live on earth in harmony with the rhythm and movement of heaven.

From facts and hints such as these we begin to see the meaning of the Altar in Masonry, and the reason for its position in the Lodge. In English Lodges, as in the French and the Scottish Rites, it stands in front of the Master in the East. In the York Rite, so called, it is placed in the center of the Lodge — more properly a little to the East of the center — about which all Masonic activities revolve. It is not simply a necessary piece of furniture, a kind of table intended to support the Holy Bible, the Square and Compasses. Alike by its existence and its situation it identifies Masonry as a religious institution, and yet its uses are not exactly the same as the offices of an Altar in a Cathedral or a Shrine. Here is a fact often overlooked, and we ought to get it clearly in our minds.

The position of the Altar in the Lodge is not accidental, but is profoundly significant. For, while Masonry is not a religion, it is religious in its faith and basic principles, no less than in its spirit and purpose. And yet it is not a Church. Nor does it attempt to do what the Church is trying to do. If it were a Church its Altar would be in the East and its Ritual would be altered accordingly. That is to say, Masonry is not a religion, much less a sect, but a worship in which all men can unite because it does not undertake to explain, or dogmatically to settle in detail, those issues by which men are divided. Beyond the Primary, fundamental facts of faith it does not go. With the philosophy of those facts, and the differences and disputes growing out of them, it has not to do. In short, the position of the Altar in the Lodge is a symbol of what Masonry believes the Altar should be in actual life, a center of division, as is now so often the case. It does not seek fraternity of spirit, leaving each one free to fashion his own philosophy of ultimate truth. As we nay read in the Constitutions of 1723:
A Mason is obliged, by his Tenure, to obey the moral Law; and if he rightly understands the Art, he will never be a stupid Atheist, not an irreligious Libertine. But though in ancient Times Masons were charged in every Country to be of the Religion of the Country or Nation, whatever it was, yet 'tis now thought more expedient only to oblige them to that Religion in which all Men agree, leaving their particular Opinions to themselves; that is, to be good Men and True, or Men of Honor and Honesty, by whatever denominations or Persuasions they may be distinguished; whereby Masonry becomes the Center of Union, and the Means of conciliating true Friendship among Persons that must have remained at a perpetual distance.
Surely those are memorable words, a Magna Charta of friendship and fraternity. Masonry goes hand in hand with religion until religion enters the field of sectarian feud, and there it stops; because Masonry seeks to unite men, not to divide them. Here then, is the meaning of the Masonic Altar and its position in the Lodge. It is first of all, an Altar of Faith — deep, eternal Faith which underlies all creeds and over-arches all sects; Faith in God, in the Moral Law, and in the Life Everlasting. Faith in God is the Cornerstone and the Keystone of Freemasonry. It is the first truth and the last, the truth that makes all other truths true, without which life is a riddle and fraternity a futility. For, apart from God the Father, our dream of the Brotherhood of Man is as vain as all the vain things proclaimed of Solomon — a Fiction having no basis or hope in fact.

At the same time, the Altar of Freemasonry is an Altar of Freedom — not freedom "From" faith, but Freedom Of" faith. Beyond the fact of the reality of God it does not go, allowing every man to think of God according to his experience of life and his vision of truth. It does not define God, much less dogmatically determine how and what men shall think or believe about God.

There dispute and division begin. As a matter of fact, Masonry is not speculative at all, but operative, or rather, co-operative. While all its teaching implies the Fatherhood of God, yet its ritual does not actually affirm that truth, still less does it make a test of fellowship. Behind this silence lies a deep and wise reason. Only by the practice of Brotherhood do men realize the Divine Fatherhood. As a true-hearted poet has written:

"No man could tell me what my soul might be;
I sought for God, and he has eluded me;
I sought my Brother out, and found all three."

Here one fact more, and the meaning of the Masonic Altar will be plain. Often one enters a great Church, like Westminster Abbey, and finds it empty, or only a few people in the pews here and there, praying or in deep thought. They are sitting
quietly, each without reference to others, seeking an opportunity for the soul to be alone, to communicate with mysteries greater than itself, and find healing for the bruising of life. But no one ever goes to a Masonic Altar alone. No one bows before it at all except when the Lodge is open and in the presence of his Brethren. It is an Alter of Fellowship, as it is to teach us that no man can learn the truth for another, and no man can learn it alone. Masonry brings men together in mutual respect, sympathy and good will, that we may learn in love the truth that is hidden by apathy and lost by hate.

For the rest, let us never forget — what has been so often and so sadly forgotten — that the most sacred Altar on earth is the soul of man — your soul and mine; and that the Temple and its ritual are not ends in themselves, but a beautiful means to the end that every human heart may be a sanctuary of faith, a shrine of love, and Altar of purity, pity, and unconquerable hope.
| |
| |

Wednesday, March 08, 2006

Lots of love in Big Love

HBO's new program Big Love should have Donald Wildmon's panties in a bunch.

Wildmon, head of the American Family Association and his pal James Dobson, director of Focus on the Family, you may remember, rattled the cages of their myrmidon followers and pressured NBC into dropping The Book of Daniel from their lineup because it depicted a priest with a drug problem regularly confiding in a physical, visible Jesus.

Big Love is part domestic comedy, part male fantasy, and part religious soap opera. Bill Paxton plays a Utah man with three attractive wives, who have amicably drawn up a schedule for who sleeps with him on which night. The family is portrayed as being very devout in their religious faith. In one episode, they pray: "Please bless us with good health and a successful store opening. Please bless us all as your loving family sealed together through time and all eternity."

Scheduled back-to-back with the ever-popular Sopranos, Big Love focuses on being "decent." The crudest the language gets is "oh, my heck," "you dumb-head" and "there's no way in H I'll do that."

The recurring bad-guy role goes to Harry Dean Stanton, who plays a "grim fundamentalist messianic prophet who has 31 children and 187 grandchildren by his multiple wives.

Being on pay-TV should keep this show around, at least long enough for it to fail or succeed on its own merit. Hopefully Wildmon and Dobson can't scare the sponsors on this one. HBO is owned by Time-Warner.

| |
| |

Irish Catholics admit to hiding 102 pervert priests

What is it with the Roman Catholic Church?

CNN has just reported
that the archdiocese of Dublin published a report Wednesday that says 102 of its priests — more than 3.5 percent of the total — are suspected of sexually or physically abusing at least 350 children since 1940, the biggest such admission to date in Ireland.

All over the world, it seems, the Cathlolic church has become a haven for perverts with a thing for children. Why has the Church allowed this? How have they hidden this for so long? What else are they hiding? What is it about the Church itself that attracts these people?

What, indeed, is it that attracts anyone to the Catholic church? Yeah, I know, I'm in the minority here, by about two billion to one. But I just don't get it.

Worship a God, but really worship the God's son, but no, really, let's worship the son's mother, who gave birth to him but is still a virgin, even 2,000 years later, as if she never died. Call the God's son the "Prince of Peace," write in the Bible that he didn't come to bring peace but a sword, and then murder and torture millions of people for 1,500 years in the son's name because they refuse to believe this stuff?

Create a Holy Roman Empire, do some internal politicking every dozen years or so, and send forth upon the world a new Pope / King, who suddenly becomes infallable in his thinking and his teachings. When priests die, make up stories saying they performed miracles, and then call them saints.

Oh, yeah, and while you're doing all this murdering and torturing and child-abusing, call other people names. Like, for example, say that Freemasons are in a state of "grave sin."

I just don't get it.

| |
| |

Tuesday, March 07, 2006

Big Brother wants to know your name before you post a forum message

Big Brother wants to know who you are before you post a message online.

New Jersey Assemblyman Peter J. Biondi has introduced bill #1327 into the New Jersey legislature to make "certain operators of interactive computer services and Internet service providers liable to persons injured by false or defamatory messages posted on public forum websites."

Before you can post a message on a "public forum," anonymously or not, your legal name and contact information would have to be on file with the service you were using.

| |
| |

Monday, March 06, 2006

Peaceful, sex-loving chimps being eaten to extinction


Imagine being so peaceloving that you greet your friends with genital "handshakes" and sensual body bumps, and that you resolve squabbles with sex instead of violence.

Unfortunately, the chimpanzees that live like hippie flower children also taste good!

The bonobo chimpanzees, native only to the rain forest of the Congo in Africa, are rapidly disappearing. In 1984, there were an estimated 100,000 of them; today, thanks to being hunted and killed for their tasty meat by poor villagers who sell their meat to "clandestine" restaurants in the cities, there are fewer than 5,000.

Despite all the sex, female bonobos only give birth once every five years, making it difficult for the species to replenish itself faster than they are being killed. Poachers kill them by getting the chimps drunk with wine, or by shooting them, and often kill 20 or more at a time by leaving poison meat for the chimps.

Local police don't enforce the laws; no one seems to understand the concept of extinction and everyone seems to enjoy the flavor of bonobo chimp, CNN reports.

"What can we do if bonobo meat is tasty?" the deputy chief of police said.

| |

Free-Masonry signs and symbols


I was driving down the road the other day, and as I rounded a curve there on Highway 23, there was this great big message from G.A.O.T.U. on the local Baptist signboard saying, "Free-Masonry is not a religion. It is a progressive science and a system of natural philosophy."

If there had been room on the signboard, I'm guessing it would have added "Free-Masonry is fun. Free-Masonry is educational. Free-Masonry is enlightening."

Imagine that!

Science is just too controversial


Recently we've touched on creationism a.k.a. creation science a.k.a. intelligent design here with posts about the death of Henry Morris and in a post about Josh the Baptist's awe of Kent Hovind.

I recently discovered a blog called Gnosos. The blog's creator is a 25-year old Ph.D. candidate who calls himself Zeteo Eurisko. He writes about his background:
For those of you that don’t believe that an indoctrinated YEC [young evangelical Christian, or young earth Christian, I'm not sure — I haven't found yet where he defines the term] mind can muster the intellectual velocity to escape the orbit of a fundamentalist upbringing, I am the exception. I was home schooled and home churched throughout my childhood and adolescence in an isolated environment of fundamentalist doctrine and Biblical literalism. My science education was learned physically at the feet of Ken Ham, Henry Morris, John Morris, and Russell Humphreys. Their word was my confidence; their books, an extension to my Bible.

Enlightenment began for me at 16, when I entered college early, as many home schooled students do — academically ahead in all aspects except turning a trained intellect on the Bible. A complete biography of my de-conversion will wait for another post, but suffice it to say that now I consider myself an honest agnostic religiously and a methodological naturalist scientifically (Yes, that means I “believe” in evolution).
In his March 1 post at Gnosos, Zeteo Eurisko relates the story of how he attended a talk at his college given by Kent Hovind, the young earth "scientist" who travels the country telling children and young people the earth is no more than 6,000 years old and that dinosaurs have roamed the earth during that time, along with many other ludicrous, non-scientific things). Read more about Hovind at Kent-Hovind.com and TalkOrigins.org.

At this particular talk, Zeteo Eurisko was the last person allowed to ask a question during the Q & A session following Hovind's speech. Why? Because Hovind had the microphone cut off in mid-sentence after Zeteo mentioned Hovind's credentials.

The cartoon panel is from the March 5, 2006 Doonesbury.

Correction: In its original form, this article inadvertently credited P. Z. Myers as being the author of the blog Gnosos. The correct author is Zeteo Eurisko, a friend and correspondent of Myers. We regret and apologize for the error.

| |
|

Sunday, March 05, 2006

Altruism is hard-wired in humans, study shows


Humans have a natural tendency to be helpful, German researchers have discovered, according to BBC News. Infants as young as 18 months show altruistic behaviour, the journal Science reported this month.

Both toddlers and chimpanzees helped strangers complete tasks such as stacking books.

The trait may have evolved six million years ago, the study suggestse goodness of their hearts" by helping non-relatives regardless of any benefits for themselves.

"This is the first experiment showing altruistic helping towards goals in any non-human primate," said Felix Warneken, a psychologist at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany.

"It's been claimed chimpanzees act mainly for their own ends; but in our experiment, there was no reward and they still helped."

The experimenters performed simple tasks like dropping a clothes peg out of reach while hanging clothes on a line, or mis-stacking a pile of books. Nearly all of the group of 24 18-month-olds helped by picking up the peg or the book, usually in the first 10 seconds of the experiment.

They only did this if they believed the researcher needed the object to complete the task — if it was thrown on the ground deliberately, they didn't pick it up.

"The results were astonishing because these children are so young — they still wear diapers and are barely able to use language, but they already show helping behaviour," said Felix Warneken.

The pair went on to investigate more complicated tasks, such as retrieving an object from a box with a flap, or picking up a dropped spoon. The children only retrived the objects if they believed they were lost accidently. If the object appeared deliberately dropped, the children did not attempt to retrieve it.

| | |

Saturday, March 04, 2006

Renounce the Rose Cross of Gold or face banishment, says the Grand Lodge of Georgia


On October 26, 2005 certified letters demanding renunciation of association with the Rite of the Rose Cross of Gold went out from the Grand Lodge of Georgia to Georgia Masons who were known members of the RRCG. [Click on the image to the left to enlarge, then click on the enlargement to make it big enough to read]. The membership list of the RRCG had been given to the Grand Lodge of Georgia in good faith, and with the assurance that the list would never be used as a means of enabling a pogrom or witchhunt against the members. Two members of the RRCG renounced their affiliation and maintained their status in their Blue Lodges; the rest of the RRCG brothers refused to sign, and by the first of the year, their names were simply stricken from the rolls of their regular Blue Lodges at the order of the Grand Lodge, with no opportunity for them to speak in their own defense. These men treated with such disrespect were not non-attending Masons; most of the RRCG men were also active members or even officers of their lodges.

The right to a Masonic trial was not allowed these good Brothers. Their names and their Masonic histories simply went down an Orwellian memory hole.

A second round of letters began arriving in mailboxes of Georgia Masons who are suspected members or associated with the RRCG on March 1, 2006.

The text of the Grand Master's Edict 2005-1 is as follows:
Edict 2005-1

Any organization(s) within the State of Georgia (to include any Internet organization(s)), or individual members or affiliates of said organization(s), purporting to be Masonic or purporting to confer or exemplify any type or resemblance to a present or ancient Masonic degree or degrees, that is (are) not recognized or accepted by this Grand Lodge is (are) hereby declared clandestine.

So ordered this 30th day of July, 2005.

s/ Albert F. Garner, Grand Master
Please note that in Freemasonry, as in most disciplines, certain words have specific meanings. In Freemasonry, traditionally a "clandestine" organization means a group of people who aren't, but claim to be, Free-Masons, that meets in secret for some nefarious purpose such as political or religious subversion. These groups are not Masonic and have the potential to be dangerous.

The Rite of the Rose Cross of Gold is a voluntary organization composed of regular Masons who seek further Masonic education than is offered through Georgia's Blue Lodges, or in the York or Scottish Rite.

Declaring something "clandestine" is simply playing games with words. Calling a group of regular Masons "clandestine" doesn't make them clandestine any more than calling an apple an orange makes it an orange. But apparently in the 21st century, the word clandestine is being used as a synonym for "heretic."

|
|

Fighting City Hall


This article is being simul-blogged on several Masonic blogs and websites across the blogosphere.

by W:.Tim Bryce, PM, MPS, timb001@phmainstreet.com, Palm Harbor, Florida, USA

"If anything in life is constant, it is change." — Bryce's Law

"You can't fight city hall" has been a part of our vernacular for many years. Basically, it is an admission that it is futile to fight the powers in charge, consequently people resign themselves to either live within the system or move on. Unfortunately, a lot of people are moving on in Freemasonry. As a small example, I recently received an e-mail from a young Mason who is resigning from the fraternity. I asked him why he was leaving and he enumerated four reasons:
  1. I just grew tired of the same routine.
  2. Some treated me like I didn't have anything to contribute; like an idiot.
  3. I couldn't support the next 2-3 people coming into the Master's chair.
  4. There is no meat to the Masonic organization any longer.
This typifies the frustration younger Masons are feeling about the current state of the fraternity. As a result, we are witnessing polarization in the Lodge room and elsewhere; Old-Guard versus New-Guard, Lodge versus Lodge, District versus District, Grand Jurisdiction versus Grand Jurisdiction. I saw this same phenomenon occurring in the computer field during the 1980's with the proliferation of PC's. During this time, the old-guard maintained the mainframe computers while the young-guard was infatuated with the new technology. The sad thing was that both parties served a vital purpose, but neither party had any use for the other. Inevitably, the new-guard ultimately won out as the old-guard eventually retired. This left a void in technical expertise for the mainframes and companies floundered.

This same phenomenon is occurring in the fraternity as younger members feel powerless against the current regimes in Blue Lodges and Grand Lodges. Whereas the old-guard is content with the status quo, younger members are looking for more substance and fellowship in the fraternity. And the two parties are not working together. The major difference here though is that Freemasonry is a volunteer organization and one becomes a member for life. Consequently, the old-guard maintains a stranglehold on the fraternity. This does not sit well with the younger members who are now looking for further light through other venues.

In my article "Are We Reading the Signs?" I described how some younger members are starting new Lodges that are unencumbered with an old-guard mentality. The ritual work of these new Lodges is excellent, they just spend less time "reading the bills" and more time on fellowship. As a result, younger members are flocking to the new Lodges, leaving the older Lodges to die on the vine.

As another example, consider The Rite of the Rose Cross of Gold which was started three years ago as another venue for Masons to practice their craft and enjoy some fellowship. According to Rose Cross organizers, the group was organized with the permission of the Grand Lodge of Georgia.

As part of their membership requirements, a person had to be a Master Mason and a member of both the Scottish and York Rites (this was done to appease all of the various parties involved). Unfortunately, something went awry over time; the Grand Lodge requested a list of their members and, from it, unceremoniously expelled all of its members from the fraternity without the benefit of a Masonic trial. To this day, organizers are at a loss as to why their membership was expelled, butthis did not deter the members who subsequently went on to establish the United Grand Lodge of America of Accepted Free-Masons (UGLofA) on December 27th, 2005.

If you read the web pages of the Rose Cross and UGLofA you have to wonder what all the hubbub was about. On the surface it appears theirintent is noble and their activities harmless. Further, there is no mention of their activities on the Grand Lodge of Georgia web site. Nonetheless, the Rose Cross continued their activities without the support of the Grand Lodge of Georgia. So much so, they started additional chapters in Georgia and Alabama. Organizers claim the Grand Lodge is continuing their policy of expelling members joining these new chapters (also without Masonic trial). Now, the Grand Master of Alabama is becoming concerned with their activities and is questioning why there is a problem in Georgia.

According to a Rose Cross organizer, "We are offering a high quality organization that provides excellent Masonic education and fun social activities. All we are doing is giving the people what they want."

I'm not taking sides on the issue in this article, but am merely noting the phenomenon. Frankly, we shouldn't be surprised by this activity as it represents a classic example of the growing rift emerging between the old-guard and the young-guard. One can only wonder if we will see more of this in the near future.

As Masons, we are taught that if we do not like the current system, we should work from within to improve it. Unfortunately, legislation is often torpedoed before it even gets to a vote. If it doesn't conform to the current policies, it is often stonewalled or sabotaged before it gets to the floor. There are even stories of character assassination of authors of proposed legislation. This is unsettling to younger Masons who, instead, are opting to change the fraternity not from within, but from without. The Rose Cross episode is but one example of this.

These are strange and awkward times for Freemasonry. We now live in an era of highly charged politics where distrust, contempt, back stabbing, and a lack of cooperation is the norm as opposed to the exception. This leads to such things as censorship and political machines with agendas. For an institution that is theoretically devoid of politics, it is political wrangling that is disrupting the harmony and moral fabric of the fraternity.

When I joined the fraternity, I was taught that every Brother was allowed to have their say, right or wrong, and allow the Craft to decide. Unfortunately, this does not appear to be the case. And frankly, we shouldn't be surprised by all of this as man is a political animal by nature. What is disturbing is the rift that is ensuing. Regardless of our age, I always naively believed we were all on the same team.

Today, Grand Lodges are demanding blind faith in the judgment of its officers. They recognize that most people are unthinking and prefer to be told what to do and how to vote. Such abdication of the thinking process naturally results in a Theory X dictatorial form of management which several Grand jurisdictions are currently experiencing. Blind faith is fine if you do not care, but unacceptable if you do. True, we should respect our leaders, but I do not believe Freemasonry should prohibit free-thought or free-expression.

Further, people do not want to sit in Lodge if there is going to be constant bickering and back-biting. Life is hectic enough without adding another level of contention. People want to leave such problems behind. If they cannot find harmony in their fortress of solitude, the Lodge, they simply will not attend anymore (and many are doing just that).

It is very disheartening to describe a scenario where young and old Masons are at odds with each other. The old-guard should mentor the new, but be smart enough not to resist change simply because "that's the way we have done it for years." Change is a natural part of life; change is constant. But change for the sake of change is rediculous. There has to be an intelligent reason for implementing change. And this can only happen if we are allowed to discuss matters openly, rationally, and respectfully. It would seem on the surface that censoring our younger Masons is a smart stalling tactic. In reality, it accelerates the change process by bringing the subject to a boiling point. Let us all hope that cooler heads prevail on both sides and Freemasonry survives well into the future.

Down in Florida, the Department of Motor Vehicles offers license plates to "Save the Manatees, Whales, Wild Dolphins, Sea Turtles, Florida Panther," etc. Let us hope we will never need a "Save the Masons" plate.

Keep the Faith.

NOTE: As with all of my articles herein, please feel free to reuse them in Masonic publications or re-post them on Masonic web sites (except Florida). When doing so, please add the following:

Article reprinted with permission of the author and "FreemasonInformation.com"

| | | | | |